Dawnfield
Designing Better Waitlist Experiences in Health and Mental Health Services
Loading...
Early Concept Video

Overview
Dawnfield is a capstone & grad project focused on improving the waitlist experience for youth and young adults seeking mental health support. Many young people wait weeks or months before receiving care, often without guidance, emotional support, or clear communication. Dawnfield explores how peer support, wellness activities, and professional oversight can create a safer, more connected, and more human experience during this period.

Why This Matters
Mental health has become one of the most urgent challenges facing youth and young adults today. Even though awareness of mental health has increased significantly since the 20th century, the systems meant to support people are still catching up. In British Columbia, many individuals, especially those over the age of 24, struggle to access mental health services due to long waitlists, limited free counselling options, and a lack of structured support during the waiting period. I chose this topic because I have personally experienced the emotional uncertainty that comes with seeking help, waiting for it, and not knowing what to do in the meantime. Through my own experience, and after witnessing similar challenges in peers, it became clear that what happens before someone receives therapy is often just as important as the therapy itself. This led me to ask: How might we redesign the waitlist experience so people don’t feel lost, unsupported, or forgotten?
This project focuses specifically on the age group 12–28, a period of life where mental health needs are high, while access gaps remain wide.

Problem Statement
Youth mental health services in BC face long wait times. During this waiting period, symptoms can worsen…
Declining Motivation
Harmful Outcomes Developing
How might we create meaningful support before formal support begins?

This project grew from a place of empathy and lived experience. I’ve seen what it feels like to wait for support, to feel unsure, overwhelmed, or alone during a time when help is desperately needed. Those memories stayed with me, and they shaped my belief that no one should feel unsupported while waiting for care. Dawnfield is my attempt to transform that difficult space into something more hopeful, where youth are guided, heard, and understood. Designing this project is not just academic work for me; it is a deeply personal commitment to helping others feel less alone.

Secondary Research
I began by analyzing three major mental health services in BC: Foundry, Here2Talk, and PeerConnect BC. Each targets a different part of the spectrum—Foundry focuses on integrated support for youth, Here2Talk provides immediate crisis help, and PeerConnect BC builds the peer-support workforce.
Further, I reviewed two government reports from BC’s A Pathway to Hope initiative, which outline a 10-year strategy to improve mental health services. From these documents, several patterns emerged:
These findings confirmed that there is a systemic gap between seeking help and receiving care. Primary Research To understand the lived experience behind the data, I developed a multi-group primary research plan involving:
  • Adults over 24 often face longer waits and fewer free resources
  • Counsellors and clinicians report overwhelming caseloads
  • Peer supporters are underutilized, but have potential if properly trained
  • Many young adults wait 30–120+ days for counselling, depending on region
  • The waitlist period carries high emotional risk, including symptom worsening and a decline in motivation to seek help
These findings confirmed that there is a systemic gap between seeking help and receiving care.

Primary Research
Interviews
To understand the lived experience behind the data, I developed a multi-group primary research plan involving:
Mental Health
Professionals
  • 3 Interviews
Peer Supporters &
Volunteers
2 interviews
Individuals With Waitlist Experience
2 Interviews
Things that often mentioned during the interviews…
Mental Health Professionals
  • “Your idea is great, but it also feels a bit utopian.”
  • “How will you ensure this system can run realistically and sustainably?”
Peer Supporters & Volunteers
  • “You need to make sure volunteers are properly trained.”
  • “This sounds like it requires me to be very professional, who would train us?”
Individuals with Lived Experience
  • “I’m not sure I could trust someone who isn’t a mental health professional.”
  • “What if some people prefer not to interact in person?”
Co-Design workshop
01
Welcome & Consent Check-in
Participants review consent and safety information.
02
Warm-Up Activity
A creative prompt to help everyone express how waiting feels.
03
Guided Discussion
Participants will discuss emotions, challenges, and possible moments of support that could improve this period.
04
Generative Design Session
Collaborative creation of ideas, sketches, or small concepts that could improve the waiting experience.
05
Reflection & Discussion
Group review of insights, ideas, and next steps.
During the co-design workshop, I was able to collaboratively build an ideal support system with one mental health professional and one peer supporter. Together, we sketched out the floor plan, explored how different spaces would be used, and mapped the flow of interactions within the service. This process helped me better understand what professionals need in order to feel confident and safe supervising peer supporters, and what peer supporters need in order to feel prepared and empowered. It also gave me insight into how physical space, atmosphere, and layout can directly influence emotional safety, trust, and wellness. Overall, the workshop grounded my concept in real-world perspectives and ensured that the system reflects the practical needs of the people who would run and navigate it.

Research Insight and Synthesis
Through my primary research with mental health professionals, peer supporters, and individuals who have experienced waitlists, several key insights emerged. First, the waitlist period itself is often emotionally harmful, many participants described feeling forgotten, unsupported, or increasingly anxious as time passed. Second, trust is a major concern; individuals are hesitant to interact with peer supporters unless those peers are clearly trained and supervised. Third, mental health professionals welcome additional support but emphasize the need for structure, boundaries, and realistic implementation. Lastly, not everyone wants or feels comfortable with in-person interaction, highlighting the need for flexible and hybrid methods of support. Together, these insights revealed a critical gap in the system and emphasized the need for a safe, human-centered model that supports people before professional care even begins.
How Insights Informed My Design?

These insights shaped the emerging concept:
A structured, professionally guided interim-care system designed specifically for people on mental health waitlists.
The system includes:
Early contact and emotional check-ins
A trained peer-support team supervised by clinicians
Guided wellness practices (breathing, grounding, reframing, boundary setting)
Hybrid modes: in-person, digital, and low-pressure options
A service model that fills the “support gap” without replacing therapy
The idea evolved from a broad support ecosystem into a more focused, feasible design aimed at improving one specific part of the system: the waitlist experience.

Conceptual Development & Validation
A ecosystem system that fills the gap between referral and treatment.
I wanted to create an ecosystem where mental health professionals provide a strong foundation, and peer supporters build on that foundation to offer a safe, accessible space for individuals.

1
1
Professionals reminded me to design for safety, structure, and sustainability.
2
2
Peer supporters confirmed the need for clear training and defined roles.
3
3
Individuals validated the need for interim emotional support and less isolating wait times.
By continuously comparing my design ideas with feedback from all three groups, I validated that this is not just a “good idea to me”—but a real gap recognized by everyone involved in the system. This iterative process transformed the project into a grounded, realistic service design concept supported by research, lived experience, and professional insight.

Project Completion
1
Ideation
Completed
2
Secondary Research
Completed
3
Secondary Research Analysis & Insights
Completed
4
Primary Research
In Progress
5
Primary Research Synthesis
Upcoming
6
Prototyping & Testing
Upcoming
7
Project Documentation
Upcoming
8
Emily Carr - The Show
Upcoming
45%
After completing the first half of my capstone project, I realized just how much research still needs to be done. This process has taught me far more than what is typically covered in my design education, especially about the complexity of mental health systems, the emotional realities of waitlists, and the responsibilities involved in designing for human well-being. I have learned that design is not only about creating solutions, but about listening deeply, understanding context, and shaping systems that genuinely support people. Looking ahead, I will continue conducting primary research, hosting more co design workshops, and refining the service through real feedback. I treat this project as a part of myself, something shaped by my own experiences, values, and hopes for a more compassionate support system. I am committed to growing it with care, responsibility, and empathy.
My Next steps:
Continue Primary Research
Host Additional Co Design Workshops
Begin Early Prototyping
Test Concepts with Target Users

At a field where a new dawn is on the way, we continue to move forward, shaping systems that care for people more gently. We fight for brighter days, and for a future where no one has to wait alone.
to be continued…